MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408026394 · doi:10.1002/ase.70009

Design of an interactive brain model for neuroanatomy education and <scp>MRI</scp> training

2025· review· en· W4408026394 on OpenAlexaff
Ethan P. McNaughton, Liam Bilbie, Matea Zuljevic, Lauren Allen, Daiana‐Roxana Pur, Roy Eagleson, Sandrine de Ribaupierre

Bibliographic record

VenueAnatomical Sciences Education · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnatomy and Medical Technology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroanatomyTraining (meteorology)NeuroscienceInstructional designPsychologyComputer scienceMedical educationMedicineMultimedia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we introduce a new virtual application that offers an interactive model of the brain for neuroanatomy education. Through a dual-platform architecture, the application can be downloaded on both desktop and mobile devices, with the mobile app leveraging unique capacities of modern handheld systems to deploy the brain model in augmented reality. In addition to illustrating complex spatial relationships between internal brain structures, vasculature, and cranial nerves, the application integrates magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data into the user interface. MRI series in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes can be superimposed directly onto the brain model, allowing students to engage with two-dimensional MRI slices in three-dimensional space. While previous virtual tools have offered a similar superimposition, none have done so through a mobile app, downloadable on handheld devices and suited to the modern student. The benefits of this function on students' spatial understanding and identification of neural structures on MRI slices remain understudied. The aim of this article is to describe the functionality of our dual-platform application, to outline its potential strengths as an educational tool, and to address possible directions for improvement following future assessments of the app's utility. Our ultimate goal is to offer a preliminary introduction to a new system that seeks to support users' understanding of three-dimensional neuroanatomy and aims to enhance their ability to read an MRI of the brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnatomical Sciences EducationSame topicAnatomy and Medical TechnologyFrench-language works237,207