MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408028458 · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1724

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer Treated with Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor: Results from the NATALEE Trial

2025· article· en· W4408028458 on OpenAlexaff
Peter A. Fasching, Dennis J. Slamon, Zbigniew Nowecki, Bożena Budny, Daniil Stroyakovskiy, DA Yardley, Chiun‐Sheng Huang, Arlene Chan, Stephen Chia, Miguel Martín, Hope S. Rugo, Sherene Loi, Sara A. Hurvitz, Michael Untch, Karen Afenjar, Rodrigo Fresco, Andriy Danyliv, Ilia Ferrusi, Zheng Li, Gabriel N. Hortobágyi

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
FundersNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
KeywordsMedicineAromatase inhibitorBreast cancerQuality of life (healthcare)Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleInternal medicineOncologyCancerClinical trialAnxietyTamoxifenPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The phase III NATALEE trial reported a statistically significant invasive disease-free survival benefit with ribociclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) versus an NSAI alone in stage II/III hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer. In this study, we report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data from NATALEE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive ribociclib plus NSAI or NSAI alone. Patient-reported outcome scores [European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life questionnaire global health status and physical, social, and emotional functioning domains; the supplementary European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific QOL questionnaire breast symptoms scale; health on a visual analog scale of the generic EuroQOL 5-level instrument; and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale] were assessed. The prespecified primary HRQOL endpoint was physical functioning. Mean scores and time-categorical and prespecified linear-time repeated-measure models were used to evaluate HRQOL changes during treatment. RESULTS: HRQOL was evaluated in all patients in the ribociclib plus NSAI (n = 2,549) and NSAI alone (n = 2,552) arms. Compliance was high in both arms (≈93%-97%). Mean scores did not differ meaningfully from baseline for any analyzed domain. Likewise, neither a meaningful change from baseline (in either treatment arm) nor a difference between arms was observed during treatment in the time-categorical, model-adjusted mean scores for any HRQOL domains-using published thresholds for interpreting longitudinal and between-group differences, with all values being within 0.5 SD of their baseline values. Linear-time regression analysis confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses of NATALEE show that adding adjuvant ribociclib to an NSAI does not negatively affect HRQOL in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207