MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408031571 · doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2025.e01332

Recent avenues in the photocatalytic splitting of water for eco-friendly hydrogen production

2025· article· en· W4408031571 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable materials and technologies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsEnvironmentally friendlyPhotocatalysisHydrogen productionWater splittingProduction (economics)Environmental scienceHydrogenWaste managementBiochemical engineeringEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental chemistryChemistryEngineeringCatalysisEcologyOrganic chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fossil fuel-driven carbon emissions are destabilizing the global climate. The COP28 conference, recently held in Dubai, UAE, under the UNCCC, marked a pivotal moment by signaling the “beginning of the end” for fossil fuels, advocating for a swift and equitable transition with significant emission reductions and increased financial support. Photocatalysts offer immense potential for sustainable applications such as hydrogen production and organic pollutant degradation. However, challenges persist, including limited visible-light absorption due to large bandgaps, rapid recombination of charge carriers, susceptibility to corrosion, lack of selectivity, and partial catalytic activity for specific reactions. This review examines the use of various photocatalysts for hydrogen production via water splitting. It discusses the reaction mechanisms involved and the different types of photocatalysts, including metal oxides, carbon-based materials, semiconductors, and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Recent advancements in photocatalyst technology have focused on strategies such as bandgap engineering, co-catalyst deposition, surface modification, heterojunction formation, and co-catalyst engineering. These approaches aim to improve photocatalytic performance by enhancing activity, broadening the absorption range, and increasing charge separation efficiency. Techniques like doping with foreign elements, modifying surface morphology, creating heterojunctions with other semiconductors, and adjusting bandgaps have shown promise in addressing these challenges. Moreover, studies have highlighted the influence of factors such as doping, crystal structure, particle size, and surface morphology on photocatalytic efficiency. These innovations collectively improve the effectiveness, selectivity, and stability of photocatalysts, positioning them as strong candidates for sustainable energy solutions and environmental remediation. Finally, this study outlines challenges, recent progress, and offers insights into future directions for enhancing photocatalyst efficiency to address global energy and environmental needs. • Photocatalysts show promise for eco-friendly hydrogen production from water splitting. • Challenges include wide bandgap and rapid charge carrier recombination. • Strategies like surface modification enhance photocatalytic activity and efficiency. • Incorporation of sacrificial agents improves hydrogen generation outcomes. • Recent advancements focus on optimizing catalyst design and light absorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it