MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408041958 · doi:10.1177/03611981241298691

Embedding-Based Representation Learning for Forecasting Flight Characteristics

2025· article· en· W4408041958 on OpenAlexaff
Aniket Biswal, Sirisha Rambhatla, Fatma Gzara

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAir Traffic Management and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbeddingRepresentation (politics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceFeature learningMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Airlines face significant challenges when building flight schedules, particularly because of unpredictable operations caused by factors such as adverse weather, airport congestion, mechanical problems, and so forth. One of the major components of flight scheduling is block time; accurately estimating block time is crucial for optimizing resource utilization and effective planning (on the scale of minutes). Given that flight scheduling takes place months in advance, accurately predicting block time is a challenging task. This is largely a result of the limited availability of features affecting operations on a specific day, such as the weather, at the time of planning. Consequently, current literature suggests that popular machine learning models are not suitable and recommends the use of statistical historical metrics. However, these methods (a) do not capture the complex latent relationships between factors affecting block time, (b) do not effectively handle high-cardinality categorical data and temporal variations, and (c) only consider a very small number of flights in their conclusions. We conduct, to the best of our knowledge, the first large-scale study of the airline on-time performance database for 2018 from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a public dataset. Specifically, our work introduces an entity-embedding-based representation learning model to efficiently incorporate high-cardinality categorical features and improve the long-term predictive capabilities of the model. These entity embeddings also encapsulate richer feature representations and their interactions. Complementary to these, we conduct rigorous experimental evaluations across 10 baselines and significance tests to demonstrate the advantages of using our entity-embedding-based model to increase long-term forecast accuracy for planning. For reproducibility, the code has been made available at https://github.com/criticalml-uw/Embeddings-for-Block-Time-Prediction .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardSame topicAir Traffic Management and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207