Orogenic arc-related Ni-Cu-(PGE) mineralization of the Ransko massif, Czech Republic, and implications for the metallogeny of the European Variscan belt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Ransko (ultra)mafic massif, Bohemian Massif, Czech Republic, hosts several Ni–Cu–(PGE) deposits and peculiar Zn–Cu–Ba ores. Geochronology integrated with petrography, bulk-rock, and mineral compositions together with Sr–Nd–Pb–Hf–Os–O isotopic systematics of barren and variably mineralized (ultra)mafic lithologies as well as massive ores reveal a complex evolution of the Ransko massif and its mineralizations. The Sm–Nd and U–Pb ages obtained for gabbros and cross-cutting granite porphyry, respectively, overlap with Re–Os ages of Ni–Cu–(PGE) and Zn–Cu ores and limit the formation age of (ultra)mafic rocks and metal accumulations to ~ 370–345 Ma. Compositional variations indicate derivation of parental melts of the Ransko massif from metasomatized, Variscan sub-arc mantle and underscore the importance of assimilation–fractional crystallization and crystal accumulation processes. The Ni–Cu ores were emplaced through the gravity-driven percolation of dense sulfide liquids along previously weakened structures associated with the downward crystal fractionation. The orogenic and arc-related nature of the Ransko Ni–Cu–(PGE) mineralization shares some remarkable similarities with some other Ni–Cu deposits in the European Variscan Belt highlighting the significance of these deposits emplaced in arc-related crustal domains. Yet, the variable nature of these mineralizations indicates complex processes that happen during the emplacement and evolution of the parental magmas driving their favourable metal contents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".