MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408052034 · doi:10.29391/2025.104.011

The Effect of CWTSAW on the Toughness of Heavy-Gauge X70 — Part II: Correlating Microstructure with Charpy Toughness

2025· article· en· W4408052034 on OpenAlexafffund
Tailin Ren

Bibliographic record

VenueWelding Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCharpy impact testToughnessMicrostructureGauge (firearms)Materials scienceComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of martensite-austenite (MA) constituent morphology, prior austenite grain size, fracture length, and notch placement on the Charpy toughness and micro-hardness in the heat-affected zone (HAZ) of heavy-gauge (19.1 mm thick) X70 microalloyed steel welded by cold-wire tandem submerged-arc welding (CWTSAW) was studied. In Part I, a series of single-pass CWTSAW samples were made using cold wire feed rates (effective heat input) of 0 mm/s (2.9 kJ/mm), 16.9 mm/s (2.6 kJ/mm), and 33.9 mm/s (2.3 kJ/mm). In Part II, the absorbed energy values at –10°C and –30°C ranged widely from 240 J (max) to 8 J (min) for effective heat inputs of 2.9 kJ/mm and 2.3 kJ/mm. The higher Charpy energies for the 2.9 kJ/mm and 2.3 kJ/mm samples tended to occur when the notch center was located in the fine-grained HAZ (FGHAZ), and much of the crack propagated through the FGHAZ. The lower Charpy energies for the same heat inputs occurred when the notch center was positioned in the coarse-grained HAZ (CGHAZ), which had a significant amount of coarse-stringer MA constituents. The 2.6 kJ/mm samples had consistently high absorbed energy results (> 190 J), whether the notch center was positioned in the coarse-grained HAZ or the FGHAZ. The number of coarse-stringer MA constituents in the CGHAZ of 2.6 kJ/mm sample was the lowest. A severity parameter (SP) was developed to correlate the severity of coarse-stringer MA and crack length in the CGHAZ/FGHAZ. The SP value increased as the number of coarse-stringer MA and fracture length in the CGHAZ increased, which correlated to reduced Charpy toughness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWelding JournalSame topicHigh Temperature Alloys and CreepFrench-language works237,207