MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408054303 · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.010337

Classical Simulability of Quantum Circuits with Shallow Magic Depth

2025· article· en· W4408054303 on OpenAlex
Y. Zhang, Yuxuan Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePRX Quantum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of TorontoNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMAGIC (telescope)Electronic circuitQuantumPhysicsGeologyTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum magic is a necessary resource for quantum computers to be not efficiently simulable by classical computers. Previous results have linked the of quantum magic, characterized by the number of <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <a:mi>T</a:mi> </a:math> gates or the stabilizer rank, to classical simulability. However, the effect of the of quantum magic on the hardness of simulating a quantum circuit remains open. In this work, we investigate the classical simulability of quantum circuits with alternating Clifford and <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <d:mi>T</d:mi> </d:math> layers across three tasks: amplitude estimation, sampling, and evaluating Pauli observables. In the case in which all <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <g:mi>T</g:mi> </g:math> gates are distributed in a single layer, performing amplitude estimation and sampling to multiplicative error are already classically intractable under reasonable assumptions, but Pauli observables are easy to evaluate. Surprisingly, with the addition of just one <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <j:mi>T</j:mi> </j:math> -gate layer or merely replacing all <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <m:mi>T</m:mi> </m:math> gates with <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <p:msup> <p:mi>T</p:mi> <p:mrow> <p:mn>1</p:mn> <p:mo>/</p:mo> <p:mn>2</p:mn> </p:mrow> </p:msup> </p:math> , the Pauli evaluation task reveals a sharp complexity transition from being in P to being GapP-complete. Nevertheless, when the precision requirement is relaxed to <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <s:mn>1</s:mn> <s:mrow> <s:mrow> <s:mo>/</s:mo> <s:mi>poly</s:mi> </s:mrow> </s:mrow> <s:mo stretchy="false">(</s:mo> <s:mi>n</s:mi> <s:mo stretchy="false">)</s:mo> </s:math> additive error, we are able to give a polynomial-time classical algorithm to compute amplitudes, Pauli observables, and sampling from <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <x:mi>log</x:mi> <x:mo></x:mo> <x:mo stretchy="false">(</x:mo> <x:mi>n</x:mi> <x:mo stretchy="false">)</x:mo> </x:math> -sized marginal distributions for any magic-depth-1 circuit that is decomposable into a product of diagonal gates. This rules out certain forms of quantum advantage in these circuits. Our research provides new techniques to simulate highly magical circuits while shedding light on their complexity and their significant dependence on the magic depth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it