Transforming narratives of physician identity formation and healing: a longitudinal qualitative study of physicians’ stories about spirituality and medicine, from residency to practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Concern about burnout has prompted increased attention on fostering physician resilience throughout the educational continuum. Studies indicate that lack of meaning-making and connection (domains of spiritual wellbeing) place physicians at risk for burnout. While evidence support including spiritual care in comprehensive patient care to help patients/families heal from impactful experiences, few studies explore physicians' spiritual wellbeing as they routinely confront suffering and death in their daily work. Storytelling taps into spiritual aspects of human experience. This study, unique in the literature, examined the stories physicians chose to tell about spirituality and medicine over 20-years, from trainee to practicing physician, to explore how these experiences impact professional development and wellbeing. METHODS: Design: Qualitative individual interview study - secondary analysis of a rich dataset of physician interviews, gathered over 20-years beginning in first-year residency, regarding attitudes and approach to spiritual care. For this new study, researchers extracted and analyzed the previously unexplored stories participants spontaneously told during interviews. SETTING: Participants completed the same USA residency program and now practice throughout USA and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: In study-year 1, all residents (PGY1,2,3) participated; response rate (RR) 97%, reflected a diversity of personal beliefs (atheist to religious). Researchers followed the PGY1 class for 20-years (2001-2020), interviewing them in study-years 1, 3, 11 and 20 (RR 100%, 100%, 97%, 54%). DATA COLLECTION: Researchers extracted stories from interview transcripts. ANALYSIS: 4 researchers analyzed 204 stories from 66 interviews with 34 physicians, using grounded theory. RESULTS: Irrespective of personal spiritual beliefs, trainees and practicing physicians told numerous spirituality-related stories. Longitudinal story themes-(1) Dissonance to Integration, (2) Formation and Transformation, and (3) Accidental to Purposeful Healing - reflected physicians' ongoing spiritual journeys as they grappled with meaning, values, purpose, and connection in their daily work. Spiritually impactful moments, whether distressing or uplifting, occurred throughout physicians' careers influencing professional/personal development, resilience and clinical approach. Spiritual practices (religious/secular) and reflection fostered healing for patients/families and physicians. CONCLUSION: Physicians' longitudinal spiritual-care stories provide new insights into their professional/personal development. Reflection on spiritually impactful moments, both distressing and uplifting, may trigger transformative learning towards meaning-making, resilience, burnout prevention and positive physician identity formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".