MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408066582 · doi:10.2166/wh.2025.352

Hydrological and physicochemical parameters associated with SARS-CoV-2 and pepper mild mottle virus wastewater concentrations for a large-combined sewer system

2025· article· en· W4408066582 on OpenAlexafffund
Luan Thanh, Mounia Hachad, Natasha McQuaid, Kateryna Krylova, Loan Nguyen Ha Thanh, Flavia Visentin, Jean‐Baptiste Burnet, Fernando Sanchez Quete, Thomas Maere, Alexandra Tsitouras, Peter A. Vanrolleghem, Dominic Frigon, Stephanie K. Loeb, Sarah Dorner, Eyerusalem Goitom

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water and Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMcGill UniversityPolytechnique Montréal
FundersTrottier Family FoundationFonds de recherche du QuébecNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMolson Foundation
KeywordsWastewaterEnvironmental scienceNormalization (sociology)Sewage treatmentSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Environmental engineeringCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT During COVID-19, surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater has been a promising tool for tracking viral infection at the community level. However, in addition to the shedding rates within the community, SARS-CoV-2 concentrations in raw wastewater are influenced by several environmental factors. This study investigated the effects of wastewater characteristics on the viral quantification of SARS-CoV-2 and pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) for a large wastewater system with combined sewers. Principal component analysis illustrated that water temperature negatively correlates with SARS-CoV-2 and PMMoV in wastewater, but flow rate and EC are highly correlated with SARS-CoV-2 in spring and winter. The normalization using EC enhanced the correlation with clinical data compared to normalization using pH, flow rate, and raw SARS-CoV-2. The normalization using PMMoV reduced the correlation with clinical data. Multiple linear and random forest (RF) applied to predict the concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater, given the confirmed cases and physicochemical parameters. RF regression was the best model to predict SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater (R2=0.8), with the most important variables being the confirmed cases followed by water temperature. RF model is a potent predictor of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater. This enhances the degree of reliability between community outbreaks and SARS-CoV-2 monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water and HealthSame topicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingFrench-language works237,207