FISH mapping in Xenopus pygmaeus refines understanding of genomic rearrangements and reveals jumping NORs in African clawed frogs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chromosomal rearrangements are fundamental evolutionary drivers leading to genomic diversification. African clawed frogs (genus Xenopus, subgenera Silurana and Xenopus) represent an allopolyploid model system with conserved chromosome numbers in species with the same ploidy within each subgenus. Two significant interchromosomal rearrangements have been identified: a translocation between chromosomes 9 and 2, found in subgenus Silurana, and a fusion between chromosomes 9 and 10, probably widespread in subgenus Xenopus. Here, we study the allotetraploid Xenopus pygmaeus (subgenus Xenopus) based on in-depth karyotype analysis using chromosome measurements and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). We designed FISH probes for genes associated with translocation and fusion to test for the presence of the two main types of rearrangements. We also examined the locations of 5S and 28S ribosomal tandem repeats, with the former often associated with telomeric regions and the latter with nucleolus organizer regions (NORs). The translocation-associated gene mapping did not detect the translocation in X. pygmaeus, supporting the hypothesis that the translocation is restricted to Silurana, but instead identified a pericentromeric inversion on chromosome 2S. The fusion-associated gene mapping confirmed the fusion of chromosomes 9 and 10, supporting this fusion as an ancestral state in subgenus Xenopus. As expected, the 5S repeats were found predominantly in telomere regions on almost all chromosomes. The nucleolar 28S repeats were localized on chromosome 6S, a position previously found only in the closely related species X. parafraseri, whereas other, phylogenetically more distant species have NORs located on different chromosomes. We therefore hypothesize that a jumping mechanism could explain the relatively frequent changes in the location of NORs during Xenopus evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".