Unveiling soil thermal behavior under ultra-high voltage power cable operations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The optimal operation of high-voltage underground power cables is crucial for powering our communities, and it hinges on the intricate dynamics of insulation temperature around the conductor, primarily influenced by joule heating. This temperature responsiveness is further molded by seasonal and diurnal fluctuations in power demand, as well as the moisture content in the surrounding soil. Past research concentrated on theoretical analyses and experiments under dry conditions, but our study expands this scope. Through extensive laboratory tests exploring static and cyclic thermal loads in both dry and saturated sand environments, we uncovered valuable insights. Cyclic thermal loads in dry sand demonstrated a significant thermal charging effect, especially with shorter relaxation times. In static thermal loading, utilizing saturated sand enhanced heat dissipation due to higher thermal conductivity. However, it also revealed a noteworthy observation: a robust convection cell formed after three days of continuous heating, presenting challenges for cables under crop fields despite facilitating efficient cooling. Highlighting the importance of high-voltage power cable infrastructure, our study delves into the critical intersection between infrastructure and the underground soil. Understanding these interactions becomes imperative for the sustainable development of clean energy initiatives. As the world transitions to cleaner energy practices, optimizing the performance of underground power cable systems becomes pivotal in realizing their full potential and aligning with broader clean energy goals. This research contributes essential knowledge to enhance the safety, efficiency, and sustainability of high-voltage underground power cable systems in support of a cleaner and more sustainable energy future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".