Proteasome dynamics in response to metabolic changes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteasomes, essential protease complexes in protein homeostasis, adapt to metabolic changes through intracellular movements. As the executive arm of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, they selectively degrade poly-ubiquitinated proteins in an ATP-dependent process. The primary proteasome configuration involved in this degradation is the 26S proteasome, which is composed of a proteolytically active core particle flanked by two regulatory particles. In metabolically active cells, such as proliferating yeast and mammalian cancer cells, 26S proteasomes are predominantly nuclear and actively engaged in protein degradation. However, during nutrient deprivation or stress-induced quiescence, proteasome localization changes. In quiescent yeast, proteasomes initially accumulate at the nuclear envelope. During prolonged quiescence with decreased ATP levels, proteasomes exit the nucleus and are sequestered into cytoplasmic membraneless organelles, so-called proteasome storage granules (PSGs). In mammalian cells, starvation and stress trigger formation of membraneless organelles containing proteasomes and poly-ubiquitinated substrates. The proteasome condensates are motile, reversible, and contribute to stress resistance and improved fitness during aging. Proteasome condensation may involve liquid-liquid phase separation, a mechanism underlying the assembly of membraneless organelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".