Chlorophyllα Distribution in Toyama Bay, Japan, during 1998 and 1999 as observed by Ocean Color Satellite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
沿岸域での海色衛星データの有効性を示すために，1998年と1999年の富山湾での海色衛星SeaWiFSのクロロフィルαデータを解析した。富山湾の湾外と湾中央では春季と秋季に二回の季節的なブルームが見られ，これは日本海全般に見られる季節的な温度成層の変化に対応した現象である。一方，湾奥では夏季に衛星のクロロフィルα濃度が減少せず，その分布は表面塩分と比較的よく対応していたことから，河川水などからの栄養塩の供給によってクロロフィルαが増加していることが示唆された。また，衛星で観測されたクロロフィルα分布の短期変動によって，反時計回りの流動が存在することと，間欠的な対馬暖流の流入によって湾奥の水が湾外に運び出されることが示された。しかし，定量的には，衛星で観測されたクロロフィルα濃度と比較可能な現場データが少なく，今後しっかりと検証をする必要がある。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".