Social Media-Driven User Community Finding with Privacy Protection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the digital era, social media platforms play a crucial role in forming user communities, yet the challenge of protecting user privacy remains paramount. This paper proposes a novel framework for identifying and analyzing user communities within social media networks, emphasizing privacy protection. In detail, we implement a social media-driven user community finding approach with hashing named MCF to ensure that the extracted information cannot be traced back to specific users, thereby maintaining confidentiality. Finally, we design a set of experiments to verify the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed MCF approach by comparing it with other existing approaches, demonstrating its effectiveness in community detection while upholding stringent privacy standards. This research contributes to the growing field of social network analysis by providing a balanced solution that respects user privacy while uncovering valuable insights into community dynamics on social media platforms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it