MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408113875 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2024-0177

Seasonal dynamics of juvenile coho salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus kisutch</i>) in wetlands of the North Thompson River, British Columbia

2025· article· en· W4408113875 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Brittany L. Milner, Doug R. Braun, Jonathan W. Moore, Amanda M. Martens, Daniella LoScerbo, Sean M. Naman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOncorhynchusJuvenileFisheryWetlandChinook windRainbow troutEnvironmental scienceBiologyEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Freshwater fish such as juvenile salmon often rely on dynamic and diverse habitats such as wetlands. Although juvenile salmon wetland use is well documented, their use of freshwater wetlands in large river networks that vary in isolation and connection is not well known. We studied juvenile coho salmon use of three wetland sites along the North Thompson River, British Columbia, Canada, from May 2021 to October 2023 to understand how seasonal variation in wetland connectivity and water quality (temperature and dissolved oxygen) influence juvenile coho salmon habitat use. We used monthly mark–recapture sampling to estimate juvenile coho salmon abundance and density. Seasonal abundance and growth of juvenile coho salmon in wetlands were intertwined with connectivity and abiotic conditions. Age-0 juvenile coho salmon were recruited to wetlands during high spring flows and used wetland habitats year-round. Periods of high density and low oxygen were associated with lower growth and abundance. Our study also provides information on the timing of juvenile coho salmon use of wetland habitats, which can be used to inform habitat managers of times of year that pose the greatest risk and benefits to these fish.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→