Alteration Lithogeochemistry of an Archean Porphyry-Type Au(-Cu) Setting: The World-Class Côté Gold Deposit, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Characterizing alteration and its geochemical signature provides critical information relevant to ore-deposit genesis and its related footprint; for porphyry-type deposits, zoned potassic-phyllic-propylitic alteration and metal enrichment are critical features. Here we integrate earlier lithological and mineralogical studies of the (10+ Moz Au) Archean Côté Gold porphyry-type Au(-Cu) deposit (Ontario, Canada) with identified alteration types to provide exploration vectors. The ca. 2740 tonalite-quartz diorite-diorite intrusive complex and co-temporal Au(-Cu) mineralization as disseminations, breccias and veins are co-spatial with ore-related alteration types (amphibole, biotite, muscovite). An early, locally developed amphibole event coring the deposit is followed by emplacement of a Au(-Cu) mineralized biotite-rich magmatic-hydrothermal breccia body and broad halo of disseminated biotite and quartz veining. These rocks record gains via mass balance calculations of K, Fe, Mg, LILE, and LREE with Au, Cu, Mo, Ag, Se and Bi. Later muscovite alteration is enriched in K, Rb, Cs, Ba, CO2, and LOI with varied Au, Cu, Mo, Te, As, and Bi values. A strong albite overprint records extreme Na gains with the loss of most other elements, including ore metals (i.e., Au, Cu). Together these data define an Au-Cu-Mo-Ag-Te-Bi-Se core co-spatial with biotite breccia versus a peripheral stockwork and sheeted vein zone with a Te-Se-Zn-Pb-As association. These features further support the posited porphyry-type model for the Côté Gold Au(-Cu) deposit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".