MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408128600 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfaf044

Effects of SGLT2 inhibition on insulin use in CKD and type 2 diabetes: insights from the CREDENCE trial

2025· article· en· W4408128600 on OpenAlexaff
Bryony Beal, Luke Buizen, Emily K. Yeung, Lauren Heath, Lauren Houston, David Z.I. Cherney, Meg Jardine, Carol A. Pollock, Clare Arnott, Sradha Kotwal, Hiddo J.L. Heerspink, Vlado Perkovic, Brendon L. Neuen

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
FundersJanssen Research and Development
KeywordsMedicineCredenceType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusInsulinInternal medicineType 1 diabetesEndocrinologyIntensive care medicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Insulin is a mainstay treatment for diabetes, but its use is associated with weight gain and hypoglycaemia. Data on the effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on insulin use in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are limited. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation trial. Effects of canagliflozin versus placebo on insulin use (initiation, dose intensification, reduction and discontinuation) in people with CKD and type 2 diabetes were evaluated using Cox regression models. The primary outcome was insulin initiation or a >25% insulin dose intensification (in those not receiving and receiving insulin at baseline, respectively). Effects on kidney, cardiovascular and safety outcomes by baseline insulin use were also assessed. RESULTS: Among 4401 participants, 2884 (65.5%) were receiving insulin at baseline; these participants were more likely to have lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, higher albuminuria and a longer duration of diabetes (all P < .001). Over a median on-treatment period of 2.0 years, canagliflozin reduced the need for insulin initiation or a >25% dose intensification by 19% compared with placebo {hazard ratio [HR] 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.93]}, irrespective of baseline kidney function or albuminuria (both P-interaction > .10). Sustained insulin dose reductions of >50% were achieved more frequently with canagliflozin than placebo [HR 1.49 (95% CI 1.15-1.91)], although no difference in insulin discontinuation was observed between treatment arms. Effects of canagliflozin on kidney, cardiovascular and safety outcomes were consistent regardless of baseline insulin use (all P-interaction > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In CKD and type 2 diabetes, canagliflozin reduces insulin use with consistent effects regardless of baseline kidney function. This supports the use of canagliflozin in people with CKD, not only for end-organ protection, but also to improve glycaemic control and reduce exposure to insulin and its associated adverse effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207