Hubungan Stroke Perdarahan dengan Fungsi Kognisi di RSAU Salamun Bandung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Stroke is one of the main causes of cognitive dysfunction that has a significant impact on the quality of life of patients. This study aims to analyze the relationship between hemorrhagic stroke and cognitive function in patients at RSAU dr. Salamun Bandung. The study design used was observational analytic with a cross-sectional approach, involving 35 hemorrhagic stroke patients selected through consecutive sampling techniques. Cognitive function was measured using the Indonesian version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment instrument (MoCA-Ina) with score interpretation: ≥26 (normal) and <26 (abnormal). Data analysis was performed using the Chi-Square test with a significance level of 0.05. The results showed that the majority of hemorrhagic stroke patients were male (62.86%) and were in the late elderly age range (34.29%). A total of 88.57% of hemorrhagic stroke patients experienced cognitive dysfunction, compared to 68.57% in non-hemorrhagic stroke. Statistical analysis showed a significant relationship between hemorrhagic stroke and cognitive dysfunction (p = 0.041). These findings suggest that brain tissue damage due to intracerebral hemorrhage has a more serious impact on cognitive function than non-hemorrhagic stroke. In conclusion, a comprehensive prevention and treatment strategy is needed to reduce the risk of cognitive impairment in stroke patients, especially hemorrhagic stroke. Abstrak. Stroke merupakan salah satu penyebab utama gangguan fungsi kognitif yang berdampak signifikan terhadap kualitas hidup pasien. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan antara stroke perdarahan dan fungsi kognitif pada pasien di RSAU dr. Salamun Bandung. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah observasional analitik dengan pendekatan cross-sectional, melibatkan 35 pasien stroke perdarahan yang dipilih melalui teknik consecutive sampling. Fungsi kognitif diukur menggunakan instrumen Montreal Cognitive Assessment versi bahasa Indonesia (MoCA-Ina) dengan interpretasi skor: ≥26 (normal) dan <26 (tidak normal). Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan uji Chi-Square dengan tingkat signifikansi 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan mayoritas pasien stroke perdarahan adalah laki-laki (62,86%) dan berada pada rentang usia lansia akhir (34,29%). Sebanyak 88,57% pasien stroke perdarahan mengalami gangguan fungsi kognitif, dibandingkan 68,57% pada stroke non-perdarahan. Analisis statistik menunjukkan hubungan yang bermakna antara stroke perdarahan dan gangguan fungsi kognitif (p=0,041). Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa kerusakan jaringan otak akibat perdarahan intraserebral memiliki dampak lebih serius terhadap fungsi kognitif dibandingkan stroke non-perdarahan. Kesimpulannya, diperlukan strategi pencegahan dan penanganan yang komprehensif untuk mengurangi risiko gangguan fungsi kognitif pada pasien stroke, terutama stroke perdarahan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".