Spirit of Place Study of Malioboro Cultural Heritage Case Study: Margo Utomo Road Section
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Margo utomo is one of the famous street names in Yogyakarta, which is located south of the white pal monument to the eastern entrance of the monument station and is included in the philosophical axis. This research focuses on the margo utomo road section which is included in the Malioboro Cultural Heritage Area (KCB). The urgency of this research is to find the Genius Loci and describe the context that is owned as a public space. The purpose of this research is to explore the city's public space by looking at image expression by finding visual uniqueness, the spaces formed and the character of the area created. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method with an architectural phenomenology approach by describing the Genius Loci that are formed. The results of the research found the role of the philosophical axis as a Genius Loci owned by the road section because it provides local uniqueness in the aspects of image, space and character. This research recommends when the development of road sections is carried out with a phenomenological approach because it strengthens the Genius Loci owned so that it can strengthen the philosophical axis as the main element .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".