Ensuring guideline adherence and cost savings in stress ulcer prophylaxis practices in the intensive care unit: a pre-post education study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to enhance adherence to the guideline through an educational program focused on reducing inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) and cost savings in the intensive care unit (ICU). Method: This study was designed as a nonrandomized, controlled, prospective study created according to the pre-education (PreEd) and post-education (PostEd) evaluation model and conducted between January and July 2024. The appropriateness of SUP uses for the indication was evaluated according to the Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados (SPC) SUP guideline. Adherence rates to the SPC SUP guideline and the costs associated with nonadherence were evaluated. Results: 495 patients were included in the study, 244 in PreEd and 251 in PostEd. 58.2% of the patients were male, and the hospitalization was mainly for medical reasons (59.6%). The mean ± SD rate of patients with appropriate SUP indication was 38.3 ± 41.6% in PreEd and 47.8 ± 42.8% in PostEd (p = 0.005). The total costs of inappropriate indication and proton pump inhibitor use in PreEd and PostEd were 272 dollars and 246 dollars, respectively (p = 0.007). Accordingly, when inappropriate SUP agent use was calculated per patient in both periods, the total cost saving was 34 dollars. Conclusion: Inappropriate SUP use is common in the ICU. Adequate adherence to guidelines and proactive involvement of clinical pharmacists may reduce inappropriate SUP use and associated costs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".