Identifikasi Potensi Lokal untuk Mendukung Pengembangan Desa Wisata Karyamukti, Kabupaten Cianjur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Karyamukti Tourism Village has significant potential for development as a tourist destination, but it still faces several challenges, such as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, inadequate tourism facilities, and suboptimal destination management. This research is descriptive and qualitative in nature, aiming to identify the local potential present in Karyamukti Tourism Village from the aspects of nature, culture, and man-made attractions that have yet to be optimally utilized. The results of the identification of local potential that has not been fully utilized in Karyamukti Tourism Village are expected to serve as a foundation for formulating appropriate tourism development strategies in the future. This way, Karyamukti Tourism Village can develop its tourism potential into an attractive and sustainable destination, providing a better tourism experience and significant economic benefits for the local community in the years to come. Abstrak. Desa Wisata Karyamukti memiliki potensi yang cukup besar untuk dikembangkan sebagai destinasi wisata, namun masih menghadapi beberapa permasalahan seperti dampak pandemi COVID-19, fasilitas pariwisata yang kurang memadai, serta pengelolaan destinasi pariwisata yang belum optimal. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif kualitatif, bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi potensi lokal yang ada di Desa Wisata Karyamukti baik dari aspek alam, budaya, maupun buatan, yang belum dimanfaatkan secara optimal. Hasil identifikasi terkait potensi lokal yang belum termanfaatkan secara optimal di Desa Wisata Karyamukti ini, diharapkan dapat menjadi dasar dalam merumuskan strategi pengembangan pariwisata yang tepat di masa yang akan datang, sehingga Desa Wisata Karyamukti dapat mengembangkan potensi wisata yang dimilikinya menjadi destinasi yang menarik dan berkelanjutan serta memberikan pengalaman berwisata yang lebih baik dan dapat memberikan manfaat ekonomi yang signifikan bagi masyarakat lokal di masa yang akan datang.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".