MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408139897 · doi:10.1093/jrs/feaf016

‘She Dug Two Graves’Winfred Kiunga. In: Nairobi Noir. Edited by Peter Kimani

2025· article· en· W4408139897 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roselyne Omondi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Refugee Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fawzia, her younger brother, and parents become officially registered residents of Dadaab refugee camp in north-eastern Kenya near the Kenya–Somalia border following their dislocation from Kismayo, Somalia. In an unspecified time, the young, female, camp-based Somali refugee becomes a motherless, childless, divorced masseuse. Concerned about Fawzia’s recurrent losses and struggles with belonging, Marian, Fawzia’s Toronto-based childhood friend resettled through a scholarship, sends Fawzia 1,500 Canadian dollars. She also suggests to Fawzia to run away from the gossip, ex-husband, and mockery in Dadaab; to go and live in Marian aunt’s house in Eastleigh (an estate in Nairobi, Kenya’s capital, more than 464 km away, whose residents are predominantly Kenyan Somalis and citizens of Somalia); start a business; and apply for urban refugee status. Camp-based and urban refugee statuses are not interchangeable though. Moving from an area designated for refugees requires consultation with the Department of Refugee Services and United Nations’ refugee agency (UNHCR) representatives. Refugees who intend to leave a camp are also obligated to notify camp officials of their plan and obtain a refugee movement pass whose validity is 30 days. Fawzia takes her friend’s advice. She leaves Dadaab without informing camp officials or acquiring the pass and settles in Eastleigh.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Refugee StudiesSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207