MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408140090 · doi:10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf018

Remnant cholesterol concentrations best explain the cardiovascular benefit of APOC3 genetic inhibition: A drug target Mendelian Randomization study

2025· article· en· W4408140090 on OpenAlexaff
Éloi Gagnon, Dipender Gill, Stephen Burgess, Benoît J. Arsenault

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersWellcome Trust
KeywordsMendelian randomizationPCSK9Internal medicineCholesterolMedicineApolipoprotein BEndocrinologyGeneticsBiologyLipoproteinGenotypeGeneLDL receptorGenetic variants

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Apolipoprotein C-III (APOC3) inhibitors are approved for hypertriglyceridemia. Genetic evidence suggests that APOC3 inhibition may also prevent coronary artery disease (CAD), but mechanisms remain unclear. Methods To clarify how APOC3 inhibition could prevent CAD, we performed two-step cis Mendelian randomization using genetic variants in the APOC3 gene region associated with plasma levels of APOC3. For comparison, we investigated proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). Potential mediators included apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol, and remnant cholesterol measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in mostly fasting samples from Karjalainen et al., and in non-fasting samples from the UK Biobank. CAD data were from CARDIoGRAMplusC4D. Results APOC3 associations with apolipoprotein B and remnant cholesterol levels were two-fold larger in the study by Karjalainen et al., (55% fasted individuals) when compared with the UK Biobank study (non-fasted individuals). Genetically predicted lower APOC3 and PCSK9 levels were similarly associated with reduced CAD risk (OR = 0.83, 95% CI=0.75 to 0.92, p=4.6e-04 and 0.76, 95% CI=0.73 to 0.80, p=1.6e-31, respectively). In the two-step cis-Mendelian randomization analysis, the association between genetically predicted APOC3 and CAD was attenuated to null when adjusting for apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, or remnant cholesterol. Multivariable Mendelian randomization using genome-wide variants showed that remnant cholesterol, not triglycerides, was conditionally associated with CAD risk. Conclusions Remnant cholesterol best explains the mechanism through which APOC3 inhibition could prevent CAD. APOC3 inhibition may influence fasting remnant cholesterol to a greater extent than non-fasting remnant cholesterol. People with high levels of remnant cholesterol could benefit from APOC3 inhibition

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal OpenSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207