MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408142221 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae923

Tafamidis in octogenarians with wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: an international cohort study

2025· article· en· W4408142221 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Philippe Debonnaire, Karl Dujardin, Nicolas Verheyen, Anne–Catherine Pouleur, Steven Droogmans, Mathias Claeys, Alexandre Bohyn, Kris Bogaerts, Milad El Haddad, Emma Christiaen, Nicolas Wyseure, David Zach, L Buytaert, Annemie Jacobs, Ian Buysschaert, Sander Trenson, R. Van Hoeyweghen, René Tavernier

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSwedish Orphan BiovitrumBoehringer Ingelheim EspañaPfizerBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicineTransthyretinAmyloidosisCardiac amyloidosisCohortInternal medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In real-world, wild-type transthyretin cardiomyopathy is increasingly diagnosed in patients ≥ 80 years old (octogenarians), although being underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. Specific data on natural course and outcome under tafamidis treatment in octogenarians are therefore scarce. The impact of tafamidis treatment on mortality in real-world wild-type transthyretin cardiomyopathy octogenarians was studied. METHODS: An international, multicentre cohort study of 710 consecutive wild-type transthyretin cardiomyopathy patients with mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 1.8 years for all-cause mortality endpoint was performed. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 58.5% (415/710) octogenarians (85 ± 4 years, 74.2% male). Before tafamidis availability, natural course in octogenarians (148/257) vs. non-octogenarians (109/257) was poor, with 16% 1-year and 71% 5-year mortality vs. 8% and 47%, respectively (P < .001). Since tafamidis availability, 70.1% (253/361) octogenarians were initiated on tafamidis vs. 83.7% (231/276) non-octogenarians (P < .001). Tafamidis discontinuation was similar (octogenarians 10.3% and non-octogenarians 7.4%; P = .260). Overall tafamidis treated vs. untreated octogenarians had better unadjusted survival (P < .001), with 5% 1-year and 24% 3-year mortality. Tafamidis treatment associated with lower mortality after propensity score matching on baseline variables, including age, National Amyloidosis Centre stage, and New York Heart Association class in on average 394 subjects [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.84, P = .007], also in octogenarians (HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-1.01, P = .053). Neither age at diagnosis (P = .217) nor at treatment initiation (P = .154) interacted with tafamidis mortality benefit. Octogenarians had poorer survival despite tafamidis, when initiated at ≥90 years (HR = 3.3, 95% CI 1.10-9.53, P = .033) and National Amyloidosis Centre Stage ≥3 (HR = 2.4, 95% CI 0.87-6.46, P = .090). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world tafamidis treatment improves survival without age affecting treatment efficacy, although mortality remains considerable in octogenarians.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207