MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408148137 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2025.02.033

Effectiveness of a Standardized Approach to Repeat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Insights Into the Value of Extrapulmonary Vein Targets

2025· article· en· W4408148137 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Nikesh Pandey, Brian C. Murray, Mehrdad Golian, Andrés Ortega Klein, Simon P. Hansom, Mouhannad M. Sadek, Willy Weng, Calum J. Redpath, Pablo B. Nery, Girish M. Nair, David H. Birnie, F. Daniel Ramirez

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsTrillium Health CentreSouthlake Regional Health CenterMcGill UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParoxysmal atrial fibrillationAtrial fibrillationCardiologyAblationValue (mathematics)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to repeat catheter ablation for recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is unknown. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing repeat PAF ablation were studied. The following 6-step approach was used in all cases: re-isolation of reconnected pulmonary veins (PVs); ablation of left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs); targeted ablation of clinical or inducible atrial flutter/tachycardia; non-PV trigger ablation; ablation of inducible supraventricular tachycardia; and additional empirical ablation based on operator judgement. The primary study outcome was atrial arrhythmia-free survival at 1 year. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients were included in the study (mean age 63.7 ± 8.6 years, 28.3% women). In this cohort, 73.5% had PV reconnection(s), 31.9% had LVAs, 10.6% had identifiable non-PV triggers, 5.3% had inducible atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia, 31.9% underwent atrial flutter/tachycardia ablation, and 12.4% had additional empirical ablation performed. Arrhythmia-free survival at 1 year was 53.1%. Patients with arrhythmia recurrence were more likely to be older, female, have hypertension, have durably isolated PVs, and to have undergone LVA ablation. In multivariable analysis, female sex and LVA ablation remained predictive of arrhythmia recurrence. Among patients with durably isolated PVs, only female sex was (negatively) associated with procedural success. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive protocol for repeat PAF ablation resulted in arrhythmia-free survival at 1 year in 53% of patients. Durably isolated PVs were observed in 26.5% of cases. None of the ablation protocol's steps was suggested to independently improve procedural success. Further research to determine the optimal ablation strategy in patients undergoing repeat ablation for PAF is needed, a growing proportion of whom are expected to have durably isolated PVs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Cardiology→Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→