MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408148355 · doi:10.1101/2025.02.28.25322740

Automated diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia on chest CT via the mean curvature of isophotes

2025· preprint· en· W4408148355 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter Savadjiev, Morteza Rezanejad, Sahir Bhatnagar, David Camirand, Claude Kauffmann, Kaleem Siddiqi, Ronald J. Dandurand, Patrick Bourgouin, Carl Chartrand‐Lefebvre, Alexandre Semionov

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsLakeshore General HospitalUniversité de MontréalMcGill University Health CentreCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMedicinePneumoniaRadiologyNuclear medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose To test whether the mean curvature of isophotes (MCI), a geometric image transformation, can be used to improve automatic detection on chest CT of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP), a determining radiological pattern in the diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD). Materials and methods This retrospective study included chest CT scans from 234 patients (123 female,111 male; mean age: 61.6 years; age range: 18-90 years) obtained at two independent institutions between 2007 and 2024. Three different classification models were trained on the original CT images and separately on MCI-transformed CT images: (1) a previously published deep learning model for classifying fibrotic lung disease on chest CT, (2) a classification pipeline based on the EfficientNet-V2 convolutional neural network architecture, and (3) a non-deep-learning model based on the functional principal component analysis (FPCA) of density functions of voxel intensity. All models were trained on data from the first institution and evaluated on data from the second institution with the recall-macro, precision-macro and F1-macro scores. Performance difference between classifier pairs was tested with the Stuart-Maxwell marginal homogeneity test. Results For a fixed model architecture and training algorithm, MCI-transformed images yield comparable or better classification performance than the original CT images. The best performance improvement achieved with MCI compared to CT was: recall-macro 0.83 vs 0.57, precision-macro 0.81 vs 0.50, F1-macro 0.80 vs 0.49, p=4.2e-5. Conclusion MCI may be a valuable addition to existing AI systems for screening for UIP on chest CT. Summary statement Machine learning methods for identifying usual interstitial pneumonia on chest CT perform better when the input CT images are transformed via the mean curvature of isophotes (MCI), a geometric transformation method known from classical computer vision. Key Points Three machine learning models were trained on a dataset of 158 patients from one institution and tested on another dataset of 76 patients from an independent institution to discriminate for usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) on chest CT in a 3-group classification task. When keeping the network architecture and parameters fixed, changing the input image domain from the original CT to MCI-transformed images improved classification performance (Stuart-Maxwell test, p < 5e-3) MCI may be a valuable addition to existing machine learning systems for screening for UIP on chest CT, whether based on deep learning or on simpler shallow classifiers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging→French-language works237,207→