Postoperative Outcomes Following Preweekend Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: The phenomenon of a weekend effect refers to a higher potential for adverse outcomes in patients receiving care over the weekend. Few prior studies have comprehensively investigated the effects of postoperative weekend care on surgical outcomes in a generalizable cohort. Objective: To examine differences in short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgical procedures immediately before vs after the weekend. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a population-based, retrospective cohort secondary analysis of adult patients in Ontario, Canada, undergoing 1 of 25 common surgical procedures between January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2019, with 1 year of follow-up. Data analysis was performed from October to November 2022. Exposure: Undergoing surgery before (1 day before) vs after (1 day after) the weekend. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of death, readmission, and complications at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year. Multivariable generalized estimating equations with an independent correlation structure, accounting for covariates, with clustering on surgical procedure were used to estimate the association between day of surgery in relation to the weekend and the outcomes. Results: Of the 429 691 patients (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [16.9] years; 270 002 female patients [62.8%]) in the study cohort, 199 744 (46.5%) underwent surgery before the weekend, and 229 947 (53.5%) underwent surgery after the weekend. Patients in the preweekend group were more likely than those in the postweekend group to experience the composite outcome of death, complications, and readmissions at 30 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08), 90 days (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09), and 1 year (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09) after surgery. Odds of mortality were increased in the preweekend group vs the postweekend group at 30 days (aOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.16), 90 days (aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17), and 1 year (aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.17). Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective multi-institutional study, patients who underwent surgery immediately preceding the weekend had a significantly increased risk of complications, readmissions, and mortality compared with those treated after the weekend. Further study is needed to understand differences in care that may underpin these observations and ensure that patients receive high-quality care regardless of the day of the week.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".