Singular perturbation analysis of a two-time scale model of vector-borne disease: Zika virus model as a case study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biological systems evolve across different spatial and temporal scales. For instance, multi-time scale epidemiological models on two-time scales are important in the study of infectious disease models. Particularly, vector-borne disease models are often described using ordinary differential equations with multiple time scales, which can involve singular perturbations—situations where rapid transitions or significant changes in system behavior occur due to small parameter variations or the interaction between fast and slow dynamics . To analyze these multi-time scale problems, we employ tools such as Geometric Singular Perturbation Theory (GSPT), Tikhonov’s Theorem, and Fenichel’s Theory. These methods provide insights into complex phenomena, including the loss of normal hyperbolicity and other intricate behaviors. Particularly, applying singular perturbation theory to vector-borne diseases allows us to reduce the dynamics to a one-time scale and understand their dynamics. To illustrate this, we present a Zika virus model and apply Tikhonov’s theorem and GSPT to investigate the model’s asymptotic behavior. Additionally, we conduct a bifurcation analysis to explore how the system’s behavior changes with variations in the parameter ɛ . We illustrate the various qualitative scenarios of the reduced system under singular perturbation. We will show that the fast–slow models, even though in nonstandard form, can be studied by means of GSPT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".