Innovative Systematic Literature Review in Telemedicine and E-Health: A Framework for Guiding Future Research and Practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Telemedicine and e-health have emerged as transformative forces in modern healthcare, addressing geographical, economic, and social disparities in access to medical services. This paper comprehensively reviews this evolving field's challenges, advancements, and prospects. It identifies critical barriers, including technological limitations, legal hurdles, and the digital divide, while highlighting innovative solutions such as artificial intelligence (AI), augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), wearable technologies, and robotic surgeries. Emerging trends such as patient-centered care, the integration of virtual and augmented reality, and the expansion of telehealth in underserved regions are examined, offering a glimpse into the future of healthcare delivery. The article also outlines actionable recommendations for future research, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to overcome current challenges and meet the growing demand for telemedicine services. Special attention is given to the role of telemedicine and e-health in addressing global crises, including natural disasters and environmental challenges as well as its potential applications in space exploration and interplanetary travel. By charting a path forward, this paper seeks to inspire researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to drive innovation, equity, and sustainability in telemedicine and e-health, ultimately paving the way for a more accessible and resilient global healthcare system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.255 | 0.456 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.048 | 0.035 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.021 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".