MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408151836 · doi:10.22487/jpwkt.v1i1.8

Penentuan Perkotaan Watatu Sebagai Pusat Kegiatan Lokal Di Kabupaten Donggala

2022· article· id· W4408151836 on OpenAlexaff
Medina Nurul Faradila Medina Nurul Faradila, Supriadi Takwim Supriadi Takwim, Amar Amar, Fitriah Fajar Magfira Fitriah Fajar Magfira

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal PeWeKa Tadulako · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitectural and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perkotaan Watatu di Kecamatan Banawa Selatan merupakan Pusat Kegiatan Lokal di Kabupaten Donggala. Kondisi saat ini terdapat beberapa fungsi pelayanan yang kurang optimal di Watatu misalnya Terminal Tipe C. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Penentuan Perkotaan Watatu Kecamatan Banawa Selatan sebagai Pusat Kegiatan Lokal di Kabupaten Donggala. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kuantitatif dengan analisis kependudukan, analisis pergerakan, analisis kelengkapan fasilitas, dan analisis interaksi wilayah. Hasil analisis menuyatakan bahwa Desa Watatu, Desa Lalombi, Desa Mbuwu, dan Desa Surumana merupakan desa yang memiliki menjadi pusat pelayanan perkotaan. Hal tersebut ditandai dengan hasil analisis kependudukan diketahui bahwa desa-desa tersebut merupakan desa dengan jumlah penduduk paling banyak, memiliki pergerakan eksternal tertinggi yang ditandai dengan adanya terminal, memiliki kelengkapan fasilitas yang berada di hirarki paling tinggi, serta interaksi kawasan yang tertinggi dengan nilai interaksi tertinggi yaitu 10.828.030,00. Hasil penelitian juga mengidentifikasi bahwa perlu adanya peningkatan pelayanan fasilitas pendidikan dan peribadatan yang belum memadai guna memenuhi jangkauan pelayanan terhadap masyarakat disekitarnya

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal PeWeKa TadulakoSame topicArchitectural and Urban StudiesFrench-language works237,207