Socio-Economic Adaptation After Natural Disasters In Langaleso Village
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On September 28, 2018, the earthquake and liquefaction disaster in Langaleso Village, Dolo District, Sigi Regency severely damaged several areas. In addition, other impacts of natural disasters that occur are resulting in changes in the social and economic conditions of the community. This is because the state of their agricultural land was wiped out due to the impact of liquefaction that occurred in Jono Oge village. The damage to the Gumbasa irrigation channel resulted in a decline in the community’s economy. The purpose of this study is to determine the form of adaptation of the Langaleso village community based on social and economic aspects both from before natural disasters, after natural disasters, and current conditions. The research method used is descriptive qualitative data analysis techniques, where data is obtained by observation techniques and interviews conducted in the field. And then, the information that has been received is then processed to get the results of the research objectives. The results of this study are that the community is still trying to adapt to existing needs at present conditions. The main problem that the village community experiences are in the economic sector. The majority of the main work of the community is farmers. Still, with the damage to the irrigation system, the district has not been able to carry out agricultural or plantation activities
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it