MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408153535 · doi:10.37559/meac/25/02

Climate, Insecurity and Displacement: Triple Barriers to the Reintegration of Former Boko Haram Associates

2025· report· en· W4408153535 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Chitra Nagarajan, Francesca Batault, Siobhan O'Neil, Kato Van Broeckhoven, Remadji Hoinathy, Célestin Dalanga, DR DOUVAGAÏ

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransboundary Water Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGlobal Affairs CanadaEidgenössisches Departement für Auswärtige AngelegenheitenUNICEF
KeywordsDisplacement (psychology)Boko haramCriminologyFood insecurityPolitical scienceSociologyPsychologyGeographyArchaeologyLawPoliticsInsurgencyPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Findings• In the Lake Chad Basin region, climate change, insecurity, and displacement are intertwined and work together to create severe challenges for communities who are already struggling in the midst of an ongoing conflict and humanitarian emergency.• Former associates of Boko Haram groups are facing unique challenges brought about by this interplay.They do not always have the same capacities to weather climate and other shocks due to lesser resources and access to adaptation strategies.Natural resource-based conflicts also affected their access to land.Moreover, women had even further limited access to input, finance, land, tools, and these strategies due to patriarchal familial and societal dynamics.• In comparison, unassociated peers could be -to various extents -more able to cope in response to these shocks.Less able to adapt and with communities unable to support them, former associates could engage in negative coping strategies such as restricting food consumption, sex work, or cutting trees to sell as firewood and charcoal.• Many people in the region have been forcibly displaced due to ongoing insecurity, including former associates.After exiting Boko Haram groups, they were often unable to return home and found themselves reintegrating into situations of displacement.Heightened insecurity meant that some experienced secondary -or multipledisplacements, and displaced ex-associates faced greater difficulties than those living in their home communities, due to language differences and lesser support from friends and relatives.• Former associates continued to receive threats from Boko Haram groups.Perceived as traitors, they were targeted, limiting livelihood options and freedom of movement, with men at higher risk of being killed and women of abductions and sexual violence.In response, women put themselves in danger by farming and collecting firewood in insecure areas to provide for families.Gender-based violence was also linked to insecurity in other ways, for example through abducted girls and women who had escaped being threatened by their 'husbands' that they would take them again.3 Background About MEACHow and why do individuals exit armed groups, and how do they do so sustainably without falling back into conflict cycles?These questions are at the core of UNIDIR's Managing Exits from Armed Conflict (MEAC) initiative.MEAC is a multi-year, multi-partner collaboration that aims to develop a unified, rigorous approach to examining how and why individuals exit armed conflict and evaluating the efficacy of interventions meant to support their transition to civilian life.MEAC seeks to inform evidence-based programme design and implementation in real time to improve efficacy.At the strategic level, the cross-programme, cross-agency lessons that will emerge from the growing MEAC evidence base will support more effective conflict resolution and peacebuilding efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransboundary Water Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207