Parametric Study of a Fully Passive Oscillating Foil on a Swinging Arm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A NACA 0015 airfoil is connected to a swinging arm by springs and dampers and is let loose in an incompressible and viscous flow at a Reynolds number of 3.9×106. The foil operates in a power-extracting regime and is free to pitch about a pivot that is itself swinging on a circular path; this contraption is called a fully passive oscillating-foil turbine on a swinging arm. This study explores the potential of four different foil configurations: with the swinging arm being either upstream or downstream of its pivot, and with or without the use of gears to control the equilibrium position of the foil with respect to the flow. The results show that the swinging arm concept offers similar performances, i.e., efficiency and power coefficient, as the railed turbine. Indeed, with arm lengths from 3 to 10 chords, efficiency values near 55% and power coefficients reaching 1.57 are obtained. Both the railed and the swinging arm turbines can operate under either a stall-flutter or a coupled-flutter instability. However, it is found that the geared models are the only ones suited when the driving mechanism is the coupled-flutter instability while both geared and gearless configurations are effective under the stall-flutter instability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".