MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408166215 · doi:10.1016/j.lana.2025.101034

Performance of the World Health Organization (WHO) severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) case definitions in hospitalized children and youth: cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4408166215 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Peter J. Gill, Caitlyn L. Kaziev, Haifa Mtaweh, Tuana Kant, Claire Seaton, Daniel S. Farrar, H. Wagman, Mei Han, Sanjay Mahant, Gabrielle Freire, Aaron Campigotto, Jeffrey N. Bone, Manish Sadarangani, Francine Buchanan, Shaun K. Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Regional Health - Americas · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of British ColumbiaChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSickKids FoundationBC Children's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersSick Kids FoundationBC Children's HospitalPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsCross-sectional studyMedicineRespiratory infectionPediatricsRespiratory systemFamily medicineIntensive care medicineEnvironmental healthInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Respiratory tract infections with viral pathogens are frequently identified using the World Health Organization (WHO) case definition of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI), defined as fever of ≥38°Celsius, cough, onset within 10 days, and hospitalization. While there is extensive research in adults, less is known about the WHO SARI case definition performance in children and youth. We aimed to determine the performance of the WHO SARI and modified case definitions in identifying viral respiratory tract infections in hospitalized children and youth. Methods: Retrospective observational cross-sectional study of hospitalized children (0-18 years) with an acute respiratory infection and who received a respiratory viral test at two large Canadian children's hospitals from July 2022 to June 2023. The WHO SARI and modified SARI case definitions were evaluated overall, by virus and age, with reporting of sensitivity and specificity. Findings: There were 2333 hospital admissions, with a median age of 2.4 years (IQR 0.8-5.0). 78% (n = 1828) had one or more viruses identified, most commonly respiratory syncytial virus (30%, n = 709). The WHO SARI definition had a sensitivity of 58% and specificity of 49% for identifying infections with a microbiologically confirmed virus. For Influenza only, the sensitivity was 71% and specificity 44%. The lowest sensitivity was among young children <3 months (28%) and 3 to <6 months (45%). Modified SARI definitions had similarly poor performance, with trade-offs of sensitivity and specificity. Interpretation: The widely implemented WHO SARI case definition has sub-optimal performance among children and youth hospitalized with acute respiratory infections. Public health surveillance based on these case definitions may inadequately detect and monitor known and emerging infections, highlighting the need to develop an accurate and reliable SARI case definition for children and youth globally. Funding: Public Health Agency of Canada, SickKids Foundation, BC Children's Hospital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Regional Health - AmericasSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207