[<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT in the Initial Staging of Squamous Cell Cancer of the Anal Canal: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Registry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (ACC), disease stage influences treatment plans and determines prognosis. Our purpose was to determine the impact of PET on the initial staging of patients with presumed stages II–IV ACC and to assess the association of disease stage per conventional workup (CW) and PET imaging to patient outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> In this multicenter registry, patients with CW stages II–IV ACC or equivocal findings for a specific stage were included. Demographic data and stage according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) version 7 as determined by CW and PET were recorded and compared with overall survival (OS). For patients from 1 of the participating institutions, CW and PET stage according to AJCC versions 7–9 were compared with progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. <b>Results:</b> There were 813 patients included. PET upstaged 150 of 531 patients (28.2%) and downstaged 84 of 531 patients (15.8%) and assigned a specific stage to 200 of 232 patients (86.2%) with equivocal findings on CW. Stage IV on PET was predictive of significantly poorer OS (<i>P</i> = 0.005). For the 136 patients with staging according to AJCC versions 7–9, CW stages I–IV per versions 7–9 were not predictive of OS (<i>P</i> = 0.684, 0.329, and 0.083, respectively) or PFS (<i>P</i> = 0.622, 0.606, and 0.115, respectively). However, PET stages I–IV per versions 7–9 were associated with OS (<i>P</i> = 0.037, 0.003, 0.003, respectively) and PFS (<i>P</i> = 0.004, <0.001, <0.001, respectively), with version 9 best discriminating PFS for stages II and III. <b>Conclusion:</b> In patients with presumed stages II–IV ACC, PET stage differs in up to 44% from CW. PET assigns a specific stage in most patients with equivocal staging on CW. The PET-derived stage was predictive of PFS and OS. Because of its superior prognostication, PET should be used routinely to stage patients with ACC clinical stage II or above.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".