MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408173338 · doi:10.1016/j.gr.2025.02.018

A billion years of geological drama – Boring or brilliant?

2025· article· en· W4408173338 on OpenAlexaff
Indrani Mukherjee, Ross Corkrey, Daniel D. Gregory, Ross R. Large, Anthony M. Poole

Bibliographic record

VenueGondwana Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDramaSeismologyLiteratureArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• The study underscores the geological influence on the evolution of early complex life, particularly eukaryogenesis (or the origins of the eukaryotic cell). • We examine various Earth system processes, including plate tectonics, atmosphere–ocean redox conditions, nutrient availability, temperature and mineral evolution, and their potential impacts on biological evolution during the Boring Billion period. • The study adopts a geo-biological approach to explain how the Boring Billion period marks the foundation for all complex life on Earth. Used to describe the Paleo-Mesoproterozoic era (1800–800 Ma), the term «Boring Billion» is, in many ways, a misnomer. The conventional focus on the significance of pO 2 for life, along with the discovery of the first metazoans in the rock record around 800 million years ago (according to molecular clock estimates), and the enduring human interest in Ediacaran macroscopic fossils, are just a few factors contributing to this undeserved characterization. Initially perceived as a phase of geological inertia that may have hindered biological development, recent research has illuminated pivotal milestones in both environmental and biological domains throughout the ’Boring Billion.’ Through a thorough review of existing literature, we present a discussion encompassing plate tectonics, atmosphere–ocean chemistry, nutrient cycling, temperature fluctuations, and mineral evolution. Furthermore, we explore significant biological phenomena such as eukaryogenesis, predation, and potential metazoan origins, contextualizing these events within the broader geo-biological narrative of the period. Our discussion delves into the latest research within the realm of established notions about this era. We emphasize the abiotic factors that influenced life’s evolution, drawing parallels between contemporary geochemical trends and the evolution of complex life forms, including animals. We also delve into the prerequisites and origins of eukaryogenesis, exploring diversification during the Middle Proterozoic. Furthermore, we examine the role of environmental cues in driving biological innovation throughout this billion-year span. This research offers an alternative lens through which to interpret geological trends and the evolutionary trajectory of complex life. By spotlighting shifts in Earth system processes—such as plate tectonics, atmosphere–ocean redox dynamics, marine nutrient cycles, and biological evolution—during the “Boring Billion”, our study invites readers to critically assess this significant era in Earth’s history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGondwana ResearchSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207