DAP12-associated synthetic antigen receptors enable multi-targeting of T cells with independent chimeric receptors in a small genetic payload
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe a series of DAP12-associated receptors that can be used to achieve multi-targeting within a small genetic payload. Empirical evaluation of scaffold/binder combinations is required to define the optimal synthetic receptor configuration. When two DAP12-associated synthetic receptors were expressed in T cells from a single vector, the surface levels of individual receptors was reduced when compared to T cells engineered with vectors that express a single receptor. The reduction in receptor expression had a pronounced effect on early, but not late, signaling events and primarily affected cytokine production. The functional deficiency was overcome by increasing synthetic receptor levels demonstrating that there is no fundamental issue related to co-expression of multiple DAP12-associated synthetic receptors in a single T cell. Our data show that T cells can be engineered with multiple recombinant DAP12-based receptors to yield multi-target specific T cells, however, thoughtful design and optimization are necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".