MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408175829 · doi:10.37934/arnht.30.1.4781

Passive Control of Base Flow and Impact of Quarter Rib Radius and Locations at Sonic Mach Number

2025· article· en· W4408175829 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fharukh Ahmed Ghasi Mahaboobali, Ambareen Khan, Mohammad Nishat Akhtar, Sher Afghan Khan, Khizar Ahmed Pathan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Research in Numerical Heat Transfer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMach numberRADIUSQuarter (Canadian coin)Base (topology)Flow (mathematics)AcousticsMechanicsMach wavePhysicsComputer scienceMathematicsHistoryMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study assesses the effectiveness of passive control as a quarter circle at Mach M = 1 for a duct of diameter 22 mm of length L = 1D to 6D. The study was conducted for a nozzle pressure ratio of 1.5 to 5. At sonic Mach M = 1, when the passive control is placed at various locations in the duct, the optimum location and radius of the rib seem to be 1D, 1.5D, 2D, and 4 mm, resulting in a base pressure almost double the ambient pressure for orientation1 of the rib where flow from the Nozzle sees curved part of the rib. The base pressure equals the ambient pressure for a 3 mm rib radius at 1D, 1.5D, and 2D. When the rib is located at 0.5D, there is an increase in the base pressure due to the presence of the rib. However, the base pressure magnitude is lower than attained for 1D, 1.5D, 2D, and 3D rib locations. The best options for orientation 2 of the rib locations are 1.5D and 2D. No appreciable results are obtained when the rib is placed at 3D for both orientations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced Research in Numerical Heat TransferSame topicPlasma and Flow Control in AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207