Facilitating Cutaneous Afferent Feedback with Texture on Mechanically Induced Stretch Reflex Excitability During Gait Termination
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cutaneous feedback plays a large role in the reflexive activation of muscle activity (Ia stretch reflex) generating postural responses during planned gait termination. As the mechanisms to induce a cutaneous afferent volley have been limited to electrical stimulation, it remains unknown if mechanical stimuli can modulate stretch reflex (SR) excitability. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of adding cutaneous inputs on modulating the SR during perturbed gait termination. Thirty young adults completed walking trials when a platform unexpectedly tilted 10 degrees anteriorly or posteriorly, inducing a tibialis anterior (TA) or medial gastrocnemius (MG) short-latency reflex. The SR latency, the peak SR amplitude, and the total SR amplitude of the agonist burst, were compared between the stretched muscle and cutaneous facilitation. Statistically significant interactions were observed between the stretched muscle and cutaneous facilitation on the SR peak and SR burst. More notably, texture resulted in a consistent expression on the TA SR magnitude, without a similar effect in MG. Despite confirming the ability of cutaneous afferent facilitation on modulating spinal interneuronal circuitry, participant variability in response to texture highlights the importance of focusing on individual participant results when studying the effects of cutaneous facilitation on modulating spinal motorneuron excitability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it