Activating Carbon and Oxygen Bonds for Low-Temperature Thermal Decomposition of Spent Lithium-Ion Battery Cathode Materials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The temperature for complete disintegration of spent lithium-ion battery (LIB) cathode materials is typically in a range of 750–1400 °C, resulting in intensive energy consumption and high carbon emissions. Here, we promote the bond activation of oxygen in LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 2 and carbon in graphite electrodes, achieving rapid gasification and thermal decomposition of active crystals at lower temperatures in the absence of other activating agents. The activation of C and O bond leads to the storage of internal energy and the transition of the crystalline phase (single crystal to polycrystal) of the active crystals. Density functional theory modeling confirms that the CO adsorption energy is significantly higher with C a –O a (−3.35 eV, C and O activation) than with no activation (−1.66 eV). The differential charge results show that the bond activation model has the highest charge accumulation and consumption, improving the electron transfer. The Bader charge transfer between C a –O a and CO is also the largest, with a value of 0.433 |e|. Therefore, synchronous activation of C and O bonds can reduce the decomposition temperature of active crystals by 200 °C and allows a low-temperature pyrolysis recycling of retired LIB cathode materials. Our research provides a potential strategy for low-carbon recycling of retired LIBs worldwide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it