MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408207844 · doi:10.1007/s00208-024-03084-4

Abelian varieties of prescribed order over finite fields

2025· article· lv· W4408207844 on OpenAlexafffund
Raymond van Bommel, Edgar Costa, Wanlin Li, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematische Annalen · 2025
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitut des Sciences Mathématiques, Université du Québec à MontréalCentre de Recherches MathématiquesSimons Foundation
KeywordsAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Given a prime power q and $$n \gg 1$$ n ≫ 1 , we prove that every integer in a large subinterval of the Hasse–Weil interval $$[(\sqrt{q}-1)^{2n},(\sqrt{q}+1)^{2n}]$$ [ ( q - 1 ) 2 n , ( q + 1 ) 2 n ] is $$\#A({\mathbb {F}}_q)$$ # A ( F q ) for some ordinary geometrically simple principally polarized abelian variety A of dimension n over $${\mathbb {F}}_q$$ F q . As a consequence, we generalize a result of Howe and Kedlaya for $${\mathbb {F}}_2$$ F 2 to show that for each prime power q, every sufficiently large positive integer is realizable, i.e., $$\#A({\mathbb {F}}_q)$$ # A ( F q ) for some abelian variety A over $${\mathbb {F}}_q$$ F q . Our result also improves upon the best known constructions of sequences of simple abelian varieties with point counts towards the extremes of the Hasse–Weil interval. A separate argument determines, for fixed n, the largest subinterval of the Hasse–Weil interval consisting of realizable integers, asymptotically as $$q \rightarrow \infty $$ q → ∞ ; this gives an asymptotically optimal improvement of a 1998 theorem of DiPippo and Howe. Our methods are effective: We prove that if $$q \le 5$$ q ≤ 5 , then every positive integer is realizable, and for arbitrary q, every positive integer $$\ge q^{3 \sqrt{q} \log q}$$ ≥ q 3 q log q is realizable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematische AnnalenSame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207