MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408212907 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.4c07002

Theoretical Study of the Reaction of Hydrogen Selenide with the Cl<sup>•</sup> Atom and the <sup>•</sup>OH Radical, and Differences with the Behavior of Other Hydrogen Chalcogenides

2025· article· en· W4408212907 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marc E. Segovia, A. Ortiz Martínez, Maurício Vega-Teijido, Alejandro L. Cardona, Luna Cartayrade, Sonia Taamalli, Florent Louis, Oscar N. Ventura

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasRégion Hauts-de-FranceCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMinistère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgencia Nacional de Investigación e InnovaciónAgence Nationale de la RechercheUniversité de LilleFrench Embassy in Canada - Cultural and Scientific ServicesPrograma de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Básicas
KeywordsChemistryMoleculeHydrogen atomAdductHydrogenSelenideHydrogen sulfideRadicalPhysical chemistryChemical kineticsReaction rate constantComputational chemistryKineticsSulfurOrganic chemistrySelenium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen selenide, H 2 Se, is the third-row analog of hydrogen sulfide, H 2 S, and water, H 2 O. While there is ample thermochemical and kinetic information about the reactions of the latter two species, few experimental or theoretical data are available on H 2 Se. In this work, we use high-level post-Hartree–Fock methods to study the reaction of H 2 Se with two of the most abundant atmospheric radical species, the Cl • atom and the • OH radical, H 2 Se + Cl • → HSe • + HCl H 2 Se + • OH → HSe • + H 2 O We used the SVECV-f12 composite quantum chemical method to study the stability of adducts and transition states, as well as the barriers for the transformations. It was found that a correct representation of the barrierless adduct is crucial for a correct description of the reaction’s kinetics, and we present in this paper the first theoretical determination of the reaction coefficient of H 2 Se with Cl • in the literature, obtaining a value of 5.7 × 10 –10 cm 3 molecule –1 s –1, in excellent agreement with the experimental determination of 5.5 × 10 –10 cm 3 molecule –1 s –1 at room temperature Additionally, using the same procedure, we obtained a value of 6.4 × 10 –11 cm 3 molecule –1 s –1 for the reaction with • OH, in this case slightly smaller than the only previous estimation of 7.2 × 10 –11 cm 3 molecule –1 s –1 obtained indirectly from similar reactions for sulfur compounds, in all cases at 298.15 K. Judging from the agreement of the theoretical and experimental rate coefficients in the case of the reaction with chlorine, we suggest that our value for the reaction with the hydroxyl radical is more accurate than the estimated one. A comparison of the dependence of the rate coefficients for H 2 S and H 2 Se as a function of the temperature shows some noticeable differences. A convex behavior of the T-dependence for the Cl • reaction at high temperatures was found, instead of the concave behavior found for sulfur. Nevertheless, this is not important in atmospheric chemistry conditions, and a sufficiently linear region was found with the expression, k (Cl • ) = 1.6 × 10 –10 exp (0.7/ RT ) cm 3 molecule –1 s –1 . The reaction with • OH is even more complicated, with nonlinear tail at high (combustion) and low (stratosphere) temperatures, while the region important in tropospheric chemistry could be fitted with the Arrhenius equation k ( • OH) = 5.9 × 10 –12 exp (1.4/ RT ) cm 3 molecule –1 s –1 . Using our theoretically determined kinetic data, we were also able to calculate the atmospheric lifetime of H 2 Se as 2.6 h, considerably shorter than that of H 2 S (12.2 h).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→