MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408224311 · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145206

Investigation of fungal mycelium-bound bio-foams from agricultural wastes as sustainable and eco-conscious packaging innovations

2025· article· en· W4408224311 on OpenAlexafffund
Yao Wang, Georg Hausner, Prangya Ranjan Rout, Qiuyan Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cleaner Production · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersDr B R Ambedkar National Institute of Technology JalandharScience and Engineering Research BoardAnova Health InstituteUniversity of ManitobaResearch Manitoba
KeywordsMyceliumAgricultureWaste managementAgricultural wasteSustainable developmentSustainable agricultureBusinessPulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceEngineeringBiotechnologyBotanyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The existing non-biodegradable plastic packaging foams pose significant environmental challenges and contribute to landfill congestion. As a sustainable alternative, bio-foams derived from fungal mycelium (as the bonding agent) and waste biomass (as the substrate) are gaining prominence. In this research, the performance efficiency of bio-foams was assessed using five previously unexplored mycelium species ( Coprinopsis macrocephalus, Bjerkandera adusta, Flammulina velutipes, Trametes pubescens, and Trichaptum biforme, ) and three frequently used species ( Ganoderma lucidum, Pleurotus ostreatus, and Fomes fomentarius ). Additionally, the study investigated mycelium-bound biomaterials with and without nutrient supplementation, employing three more mycelium species ( Ganoderma lucidum, Flammulina velutipes and Pleurotus ostreatus ). The fabrication process employed a mother-culture based method. The assessment included the following aspects of eleven mycelium-bound bio-foams: dry density, growth performance, mechanical properties (support factor, firmness, recovery rate, etc.), moisture content, morphological analysis, shrinkage percentage, thermogravimetric analysis, thickness swelling and water absorption properties. Results indicated that the compressive firmness of various bio-foams ranged from 10.33 to 52.97 kPa, while the commercial packaging foam was 24.48 kPa. Similarly, the density of the mycelium-bound bio-foams ranged from 78.53 to 153.59 kg/m 3 compared to commercial packaging foam with a density range from 8 to 120 kg/m 3 , making bio-foams competitive alternatives. The bio-foams generated from Bjerkandera adusta and Fomes fomentarius exhibited favourable colonisation conditions, a mycelial skin that was strong, thick hyphae, and mechanical properties that were similar to those of typical packing foams. The novel mycelium specie Bjerkandera adusta has intriguing properties that make them prospective candidates for mycelium-bound packing foams, in addition to the widely utilised Ganoderma lucidum, Pleurotus ostreatus, and Fomes fomentarius . • Fungal mycelia-bound bio-foams are synthesized from agricultural wastes • Novel species, Bjerkandera adusta and Fomes fomentarius have promising potential • The potential of bio-foams as sustainable packaging alternatives is assessed • Performance efficiency of 11 mycelium-bound bio-foams has been evaluated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cleaner ProductionSame topicPlant and Biological Electrophysiology StudiesFrench-language works237,207