MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408228921 · doi:10.1080/21504857.2024.2441998

Plural identities, genders, and citizenships in Tom Taylor’s and John Timms’ <i>Superman: Son of Kal-El</i> (2021–22)

2025· article· en· W4408228921 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Ue

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Graphic Novels & Comics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupermanPluralMorita therapyArtArt historyPhilosophyPsychologyPsychoanalysisLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Much of the discourse surrounding Tom Taylor’s and John Timms’ Superman: Son of Kal-El (2021–22) has concentrated on the titular character Jon Kent’s bisexuality. Actor Dean Cain, best known for his portrayal of Clark Kent in Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman (1993–97), goes so far as to critique the series’ wokeness in an op-ed for Real Clear Politics (14 October 2021). In this article, I attend to the first six issues of Son of Kal-El, beginning with Jon’s plural statuses as the child of both a Kryptonian and a human, and as a lover of both men and women. My central claim is that Taylor and Timms employ these positions to empower Jon, allowing him to deal with pressing issues. In the series, Jon investigates and provides relief to Gamorran refugees in response to discoveries made by his love interest and now partner, the journalist Jay Nakamura, himself a Gamorran refugee: the nation of Gamorra is prevalently advertised as a paradise when it is, in fact, a hotbed of crime. My essay advances scholarship by revealing how Taylor and Timms write back to earlier incarnations of Superman and superhero narratives and by reflecting on how comics enable them to engage readers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Graphic Novels & ComicsSame topicComics and Graphic NarrativesFrench-language works237,207