MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408244119 · doi:10.1164/rccm.202409-1752oc

Camlipixant in Refractory Chronic Cough: A Phase 2b, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial (SOOTHE)

2025· article· en· W4408244119 on OpenAlexaff
John A. Smith, Surinder S. Birring, Michael S. Blaiss, Lorcan McGarvey, Alyn H. Morice, Mandel Sher, Kevin J. Carroll, Margaret Garin, Sylvain Lanouette, Joan Shaw, Ronghua Yang, Catherine M. Bonuccelli

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory and Cough-Related Research
Canadian institutionsBellus Health (Canada)
FundersManchester Biomedical Research CentreNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboChronic coughRandomized controlled trialRefractory (planetary science)Confidence intervalClinical endpointAdverse effectInternal medicineVisual analogue scaleAnesthesiaAsthmaPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale There is no broadly accessible treatment for patients with refractory chronic cough, a disease characterized by chronic cough that persists despite treatment for other cough-related etiologies or has no identified underlying cause. Objectives SOOTHE (NCT04678206), a phase 2b, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, evaluated the efficacy and safety of P2X3 antagonist camlipixant in adults with refractory chronic cough (cough duration, ⩾1 yr; baseline awake cough frequency, ⩾25 coughs/h). Methods After a single-blind, 16-day placebo run-in, patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive camlipixant 12.5, 50, or 200 mg twice daily or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to Day 28 in objective 24-hour cough frequency. Secondary endpoints included cough severity and cough-related quality of life. Measurements and Main Results Overall, 310 patients were randomized. A statistically significant reduction in placebo-adjusted 24-hour cough frequency was seen in the 50 mg (−34.4%; 95% confidence interval, −50.5 to −13.3; P = 0.0033) and 200 mg (−34.2%; 95% confidence interval, −50.7 to −12.2; P = 0.0047) camlipixant arms. All camlipixant arms showed a trend for greater improvement in cough severity visual analog scale and Leicester Cough Questionnaire scores over placebo. Camlipixant was well tolerated with no serious treatment-emergent adverse events reported. Taste alteration occurred in 4.8–6.5% of patients in camlipixant arms (vs. 0% with placebo); these were usually mild–moderate. Conclusions Camlipixant treatment reduced cough frequency and improved patient-reported outcomes in patients with refractory chronic cough, with an acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04678206).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchFrench-language works237,207