High-resolution proteomic analysis of medulloblastoma clinical samples identifies therapy-resistant subgroups and MYC immunohistochemistry as a powerful outcome predictor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While international consensus and the 2021 WHO classification recognize multiple molecular medulloblastoma subgroups, these are difficult to identify in clinical practice utilizing routine approaches. As a result, biology-driven risk stratification and therapy assignment for medulloblastoma remains a major clinical challenge. Here, we report mass spectrometry-based analysis of clinical samples for medulloblastoma subgroup discovery, highlighting a MYC-driven prognostic signature and MYC immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a clinically tractable method for improved risk stratification. METHODS: We analyzed 56 formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) medulloblastoma samples by data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry identifying a MYC proteome signature in therapy-resistant group 3 medulloblastoma. We validated MYC IHC prognostic and predictive value across 2 groups of 3/4 medulloblastoma clinical cohorts (n = 362) treated with standard therapies. RESULTS: After the exclusion of WNT tumors, MYC IHC was an independent predictor of therapy resistance and death [HRs 23.6 and 3.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-536.18 and 1.84-5.66; P = .047 and <.001]. Notably, only ~50% of the MYC IHC-positive tumors harbored MYC amplification. Accordingly, cross-validated survival models incorporating MYC IHC outperformed current risk stratification schemes including MYC amplification, and reclassified ~20% of patients into a more appropriate very high-risk category. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a high-resolution proteomic dataset that can be used as a reference for future biomarker discovery. Biology-driven clinical trials should consider MYC IHC status in their design. Integration of MYC IHC in classification algorithms for non-WNT tumors could be rapidly adopted on a global scale, independently of advanced but technically challenging molecular profiling techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".