MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408248323 · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1548319

Cognitive outcomes after extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery in elderly patients diagnosed with atherosclerotic cerebral steno-occlusive artery disease

2025· article· en· W4408248323 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu Duan, Jian Li, Xin Zhang, Shihong Li, Qiliang Chai, Yingying Zhang, Guohui Huang, Ziwei Xu, Zhu-yu Li, Renling Mao, Dongwei Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Aging Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeBypass surgeryStroke (engine)CohortSurgeryAngiographyInternal medicineCardiologyRadiologyArtery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The safety and clinical effectiveness of extracranial–intracranial (EC–IC) bypass surgery in elderly patients with atherosclerotic internal carotid artery and/or middle cerebral artery steno-occlusive (ACMSO) disease remain ambiguous. Here, we analyzed our experience of EC-IC bypass surgery to evaluate its clinical safety and effect on the cognitive function for elderly patients with ACMSO. Methods This retrospective study enrolled patients >60 years of age diagnosed with ACMSO who underwent EC–IC bypass surgery at the authors' center between January 2018 and January 2021. Indications for bypass surgery included symptomatic ACMSO defined by cerebral angiography and evidence of relative hypoperfusion in the territories of steno-occlusive arteries based on computed tomography perfusion (CTP) neuroimaging. All patients underwent the Montreal Cognitive Assessment preoperatively and 2 years after bypass surgery. Clinical data, such as the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and cognitive function scores, and CTP parameters were retrospectively analyzed. Results The study cohort ultimately included data from 65 patients (60–68 years of age; median age, 66 years) who underwent 82 bypass surgeries. The patency rate of bridge arteries was 100% on intraoperative fluoroscopy and 95.0% (76/80) according to cerebral angiography at the last follow-up. The perioperative stroke rate was 1.54 % and the mortality rate was 3.08% in the 2nd year of follow-up. Compared with preoperative data, the mismatch volume of CTP was reduced (P < 0.001), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score significantly increased (P < 0.001) 2 years after bypass surgery. Forty patients in the cognitive improvement group had a higher educational level (P = 0.020), shorter course of disease (P = 0.041), shorter mean transit time (MTT) (P < 0.001), and shorter time to peak value (P = 0.015) on CTP, as determined by single-factor analysis before bypass, compared with those in the inactive group. Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, a shorter preoperative MTT was an independent clinical factor for cognitive improvement after bypass (odds ratio 0.452 [95% confidence interval 0.082–0.760]; P = 0.003). Conclusion EC–IC bypass surgery was safe and improved cognitive function in elderly patients diagnosed with ACMSO. Reversible cerebral perfusion function is one of the better prognoses, which needs to be confirmed in future study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Aging NeuroscienceSame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207