MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Embodied carbon in mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems: A critical literature review

2025· article· en· W4408248816 on OpenAlexaff
Matt Roberts, Claudiane Ouellet‐Plamondon, Paul Raftery

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilding and Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersCenter for the Built EnvironmentClimateWorks Foundation
KeywordsEmbodied cognitionArchitectural engineeringEngineeringNanotechnologyComputer scienceMaterials scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Critical reviews life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) systems • Identifies best reporting practices to improve comparability and transparency of LCAs • Summarizes ten key research gaps to improve LCAs of MEP systems • Approx. 50 kgCO 2 e/m² lower bound estimate for product stage GWP impacts of MEP system The environmental impacts of mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) systems have been largely overlooked and are commonly excluded from building-scale life cycle assessments (LCAs). Understanding the impacts and reduction potential of these systems is crucial for decarbonizing retrofits and new buildings. Therefore, we have conducted a critical review of LCA studies on MEP systems in buildings, selected using a systematic method, to identify: 1) estimates for upfront embodied [A1-A5] and replacement [B4] carbon impacts; 2) LCA reporting fundamentals needed to ensure transparency and interpretability of results; 3) future research directions. Since 2016, 54 studies presented sufficient information to investigate presented methodologies and LCA results of MEP systems. The review reinforces the need to report environmental impacts by individual life cycle stages and building or system elements to interpret influencing factors and enable further utility of results. Two studies did not report the impact assessment method nor background dataset used for the assessment rendering their results incomparable with others and are excluded from analysis. Based on the median (and mean) of the reviewed studies, estimates for A1-A3 and A1-A5 of the MEP systems are 40 (49) and 49 (61) k g C O 2 e / m ² , respectively. Additionally, based on reviewed studies, the systems will be replaced at least twice throughout a 60-year reference study period leading to approximately 100 k g C O 2 e / m ² for B4. These values almost certainly underestimate actual impacts due to the incomplete physical scopes spanned by the studies. Studies with more complete scopes generally reported higher values. The variability in scopes covered, reporting practices, and values reported, and the relatively small number of studies found, highlight the need for further investigation and improvement. Ten key research needs are identified, including the impact reduction potential of MEP systems and the influence of system layout and typology on the reported impacts. Additionally, future research should develop system specific benchmarks and reduction strategies while moving away from purely descriptive studies that report environmental impacts using single-point values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuilding and EnvironmentSame topicEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207