Integration of interculturality in education for sustainable development
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to global environmental challenges, there has been a growing demand over the last century to develop the field of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). While most research in the ESD field recognizes the importance of the cultural dimension, very few studies focus on interculturality. Despite its importance in promoting international cooperation and consensus, the development of intercultural competencies has not been consistently studied. This article examines the relationship between ESD and intercultural education by analyzing two pedagogical experiments with school groups in Guadeloupe and Quebec who worked synchronously and collaboratively on sustainable development themes. Our analysis shows that many competencies acquired during the experiments are characteristic of ESD, such as behavioral and emotional skills, including communication and empathy. This supports the idea that culture and interculturality can serve as a catalyst for ESD. Designing pedagogy based on interculturality can enhance the understanding of sustainable development issues and foster the development of crucial SD competencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it