MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408287490 · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2025.108583

Astrocyte activation in the cat dLGN following monocular retinal inactivation

2025· article· en· W4408287490 on OpenAlexafffund
Kevin R. Duffy

Bibliographic record

VenueVision Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRetinalNeuroscienceMonocularAstrocyteChemistryPsychologyBiophysicsOphthalmologyBiologyMedicinePhysicsOpticsCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Monocular inactivation elicits an eye-specific increase in GFAP labeling within the dLGN. • The increase in GFAP persists even after inactivation wears off and binocular vision is restored. • The magnitude of GFAP elevation varies according to the age at which inactivation occurs. • Increased GFAP was not accompanied by a change in the number of dLGN neurons. Monocular deprivation obstructs the development of visual neural circuits and can impair vision for a lifetime. Effective treatment of this visual disorder, amblyopia, with patching therapy is limited by a short and early critical period, as well as by poor compliance with prescribed treatment. Temporary pharmacological inactivation of the dominant eye has emerged as a means to rapidly correct the effects of monocular deprivation in animal models. Recovery occurs at older ages, and inactivation causes no apparent damage to neural connections within the primary visual pathway. It is unclear what mechanisms protect synaptic connections serving the inactivated eye. Astrocytes are important for the development and maintenance of synapses throughout the nervous system, and can compensate for a prolonged decrease in neural activity. The aim of the current study was to investigate a possible role for astrocytes in mediating the protection of neural connections following monocular inactivation. A significant increase in immunolabeling for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a marker for astrocyte activation, was measured within inactivated-eye layers of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus from otherwise normal animals. Elevated levels of GFAP persisted even after the period of inactivation wore off, and GFAP was not significantly elevated following monocular deprivation by lid closure. These results implicate astrocyte activation as a possible mechanism that mediates the safeguarding of neural connections during monocular retinal inactivation. The viability of retinal inactivation as a safe and effective treatment for human amblyopia is facilitated by advancing the understanding of its effects within the visual system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVision ResearchSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207